Update 2012 October 10: Based on the manufacturer’s evaluation, it was determined that a faulty drive cable caused the inability to return the source back to the shielded position (which resulted in exposure to the radiographer). Specifically, the cable was corroded, rusted, stiff, and had no lubrication. Also, the control pistol assembly components showed significant signs of rusting, and the control housings were taped to allow continued use. The manufacturer concluded that the drive cable failed due to a combination of wear, corrosion, and lack of lubrication indicative of improper maintenance. The radiographer stated he had performed a survey of the camera and the source guide tube prior to disconnecting the source guide tube (and the reading was 20mR/hr, as expected). However, although required, he had not checked the condition of the drive cable prior to using it although he initialed the daily work sheet indicating he had completed his daily equipment check. The licensee performed dose calculations and assigned a dose of 290 mSv (29 rem) to the radiographer. Based on the revised dose of 290 mSv (29 rem), the rating of this event was reduced from Level 3 to Level 2. NRC EN47768
Preliminary Assessment :During work activities, a licensee’s radiographer [Radiographer A] appears to have been overexposed while carrying a guide tube that contained a 2.405 TBq (65 curies) Ir-192 source. Radiographer A was conducting work activities on a platform. When he had completed the series of shots, he signaled to Radiographer B, on the deck below, to crank in the source. Radiographer A surveyed the camera and then disconnected the source guide tube and laid it on the scaffold while he lowered the camera. He then picked up the source guide tube, placed it around his neck, and climbed down the ladder to the deck below. Radiographer A laid down the source guide tube and noticed that Radiographer B was having trouble disconnecting the crank-out device from the camera. Radiographer A observed that the camera was still unlocked. He surveyed the camera and then the source guide tube. Radiographer A reported that it was then that their survey meter indicated the source was in the source guide tube and both of their personal dose rate alarms sounded. Radiographer A picked-up the guide tube using long tongs and the source fell out of the guide tube onto the deck. Preliminary estimates are that the guide tube containing the source was around the radiographer’s neck for approximately 15 seconds and his hands were on the guide tube for approximately 30 seconds. However, the exact source location inside the guide tube is presently unknown. The licensee estimated that the radiographer received a 0.56 Sv (56 rem) dose to the whole body and possibly more than 1 Sv (100 rem) dose to the extremities. The licensee’s consultant conducted the source retrieval. Ongoing actions involve an investigation, reconstruction of the event to refine the dose estimate, expedited processing of the licensee’s dosimetry, and contact with the U.S. Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site (REAC/TS) to assist with the exposure evaluation.
Everywhere you look, the nuclear industry’s hype machine is in overdrive. Goldman Sachs, Microsoft, and the UK government all tout small modular reactors as the silver bullet for climate change and energy security. Tech billionaires are hiring nuclear veterans. Wall Street is whispering about “round-the-clock power” for artificial intelligence data centers. For those old enough […]
Kernenergie en veiligheid: A wargame sought to test if a major radiological release that would prompt the evacuation of millions of civilians in South Korea could distract key US allies from assisting and rebuffing an all-out military invasion of Taiwan. The short answer was yes. The game originally presumed that China, wanting to keep the […]
Big batteries and EVs to the rescue again as faults with new nuclear plant cause chaos on Nordic grids The Finnish nuclear power plant Olkiluoto was finally connected to the grid last year, at an estimated cost of €11 billion compared to the original budget of €3 billion. That cost blowout forced its developer, the […]
A vast subsea nuclear graveyard planned to hold Britain’s burgeoning piles of radioactive waste is set to become the biggest, longest-lasting and most expensive infrastructure project ever undertaken in the UK. The project [UK's nuclear waste dump] is now predicted to take more than 150yrs to complete with lifetime costs of £66bn in today’s money...The […]
Last year, the Dutch Province of Limburg started an alliance in which, besides the local government, research institutes, small nuclear reactor (SMR) developers, utilities, industrial customers and funders cooperated. With this "Limburg SMR alliance" Limburg tried to lead the way towards an SMR in Limburg. The preferred site for a first SMR would be Chemelot, […]