On November 29, 2001, the licensee identified a potential common mode failure of the auxiliaryfeedwater (AFW) system upon a loss of instrument air. Specifically, a loss of instrument air would cause the AFW minimum flow recirculation valves to fail closed. At the time, there were no backup air or nitrogen accumulators associated with these specific valves. If the discharge or flow control valves for the AFW pumps had been throttled or closed while the minimum flow recirculation valves were also closed, the AFW pumps would have been placed in a condition of insufficient flow. This could have resulted in pump damage in a short interval of time. The licensee also identified that early in the post reactor trip emergency operating procedures, the operators were directed to control the AFW system flow without specific written guidance to maintain minimum AFW flow. The plant operators were directed to control flow to the steam generators to maintain desired level and to prevent overcooling of the reactor coolant system. The AFW minimum flow recirculation valves are air-operated. Without the short-term recovery of instrument air (within less than 10 minutes), the AFW minimum flow recirculation valves would fail closed, potentially damaging the AFW pumps and causing the loss of secondary heat removal capability. There was no indication of recirculation flow available to operators in the control room. Heat removal capability through primary system feed and bleed would also be adversely affected since instrument air is required to operate the pressurizer power-operated relief valves and nitrogen backup was not available. A loss of instrument air would cause a loss of normal feedwater and would initiate a dual-unit reactor trip.
In addition, other initiating events, e.g., fire, loss of off-site power, may have a similar vulnerability. The licensee’s corrective actions included prompt operator training, procedural changes to the emergency operating procedures, and the addition of back-up pneumatic supplies for the AFW pump minimum flow recirculation valves.
Location: POINT BEACH 1&2 Event date: Thu, 29-11-2001
Everywhere you look, the nuclear industry’s hype machine is in overdrive. Goldman Sachs, Microsoft, and the UK government all tout small modular reactors as the silver bullet for climate change and energy security. Tech billionaires are hiring nuclear veterans. Wall Street is whispering about “round-the-clock power” for artificial intelligence data centers. For those old enough […]
Kernenergie en veiligheid: A wargame sought to test if a major radiological release that would prompt the evacuation of millions of civilians in South Korea could distract key US allies from assisting and rebuffing an all-out military invasion of Taiwan. The short answer was yes. The game originally presumed that China, wanting to keep the […]
Big batteries and EVs to the rescue again as faults with new nuclear plant cause chaos on Nordic grids The Finnish nuclear power plant Olkiluoto was finally connected to the grid last year, at an estimated cost of €11 billion compared to the original budget of €3 billion. That cost blowout forced its developer, the […]
A vast subsea nuclear graveyard planned to hold Britain’s burgeoning piles of radioactive waste is set to become the biggest, longest-lasting and most expensive infrastructure project ever undertaken in the UK. The project [UK's nuclear waste dump] is now predicted to take more than 150yrs to complete with lifetime costs of £66bn in today’s money...The […]
Last year, the Dutch Province of Limburg started an alliance in which, besides the local government, research institutes, small nuclear reactor (SMR) developers, utilities, industrial customers and funders cooperated. With this "Limburg SMR alliance" Limburg tried to lead the way towards an SMR in Limburg. The preferred site for a first SMR would be Chemelot, […]