On 96-05-24, a radiation control technician was in the process of exiting the reactor building when his gamma meter alarmed. During subsequent survey of the area, he discovered narrow radiation beams (approximately 5 cm diameter) of around 8 mSv/h gamma emanating from horizontal flux detector (HFD) sites 6 and 7, both of which are spare sites with no flux detection instrumentation installed.. The spare HFD sites are located approximately 0.2 meters above the reactor vessel center-line, and contain a guide tube that passes through the core. Examination of the equipment showed that radiation shields normally installed on these ports were not present. Investigation determined that these shields were removed between July 9 to 15 1995, to allow access for pressure tube measurements during the 1995 outage, but were not reinstalled. The outage lasted until late December when the reactor was returned to full power operation. The reactor operated for approximately 5 months without the shields in place. The narrow beam width resulted in the beams being extremely difficult to detect and as such, exposure could have been received yet gone undetected by dosimetry. During this period, two members of station staff worked in the area of the HFD units, but their dosimetry did not detect any abnormal exposure. A detailed reconstruction of the work was used to determine the exposure received. This reconstruction was assisted by review of photographic records taken during the original work. The doses assigned are well within the range experience by Atomic Radiation Workers. The two staff members were assigned whole body doses of 0.92 and 1.75 mSv. Eighteen fuel handlers, who had performed operations in the area, were assigned doses ranging from 0.13 to 1.3 mSv. Exposures to other individuals was estimated as less than 0.1 mSv which is below the reporting level. This incident, provisionally rated at level 2 on the INES scale, has been reduced to a level 1 rating based on the results of the final dose assessment. No administrative or statutory dose limits were exceeded, however, defence-in-depth was degraded.
Location: POINT LEPREAU Event date: Fri, 24-05-1996
Everywhere you look, the nuclear industry’s hype machine is in overdrive. Goldman Sachs, Microsoft, and the UK government all tout small modular reactors as the silver bullet for climate change and energy security. Tech billionaires are hiring nuclear veterans. Wall Street is whispering about “round-the-clock power” for artificial intelligence data centers. For those old enough […]
Kernenergie en veiligheid: A wargame sought to test if a major radiological release that would prompt the evacuation of millions of civilians in South Korea could distract key US allies from assisting and rebuffing an all-out military invasion of Taiwan. The short answer was yes. The game originally presumed that China, wanting to keep the […]
Big batteries and EVs to the rescue again as faults with new nuclear plant cause chaos on Nordic grids The Finnish nuclear power plant Olkiluoto was finally connected to the grid last year, at an estimated cost of €11 billion compared to the original budget of €3 billion. That cost blowout forced its developer, the […]
A vast subsea nuclear graveyard planned to hold Britain’s burgeoning piles of radioactive waste is set to become the biggest, longest-lasting and most expensive infrastructure project ever undertaken in the UK. The project [UK's nuclear waste dump] is now predicted to take more than 150yrs to complete with lifetime costs of £66bn in today’s money...The […]
Last year, the Dutch Province of Limburg started an alliance in which, besides the local government, research institutes, small nuclear reactor (SMR) developers, utilities, industrial customers and funders cooperated. With this "Limburg SMR alliance" Limburg tried to lead the way towards an SMR in Limburg. The preferred site for a first SMR would be Chemelot, […]