A radiography trainee received a dose of 0.075 Sv (7.50 rem) to the whole body and 0.258 Sv (25.8 rem) to the extremities due to a disconnected 2.33 TBq (63 Ci) Ir-192 source. This dose was determined through reconstruction of the event and dose calculations. The trainee did not wear his dosimetry badge and he did not turn on his alarming rate meter. He connected the source without supervision and began to take radiography shots of a pipe. After the third shot, he cranked the drive cable without the source back in the camera. He did not perform a survey to make sure the source was back in the camera. He walked up to the pipe and exchanged the film. He moved the end of the guide tube inside the pipe placing his hand approximately four inches from where the source was located. He walked back and cranked the drive cable back to the end of the guide tube and backed away from the cranks during the shot time. He repeated this three more times, and while he was disconnecting the guide tube from the camera to switch to a guide tube with a collimator, he noticed that the indicator on the camera showed that the source was not back in the camera. He checked his personal dosimeter and found it off scale. He reported this to his trainer. The radiation safety officer and an assistant arrived to perform the source retrieval. They inspected the source assembly connector and the drive cable connection, and connected them. They cranked the source back into the camera. The trainee did not have any symptoms of radiation exposure, which was supported by daily pictures of his hands and weekly bloodwork collected for a month. The cause of the incident was failure to properly connect the source assembly to the drive cable followed by a failure to use a survey meter. Another cause was that the trainer did not supervise the trainee. The licensee reported that they have conducted retraining with all radiographers and have suspended the two radiographers in this incident. The licensee has reported that they will increase the frequency of their audits. The dose to the trainee exceeded the U.S. regulatory limit for the annual whole body dose of 0.05 Sv (5 rem). EN56761.
Location: Odessa, TX / Pro Inspection Inc. Event date: Tue, 26-09-2023
A vast subsea nuclear graveyard planned to hold Britain’s burgeoning piles of radioactive waste is set to become the biggest, longest-lasting and most expensive infrastructure project ever undertaken in the UK. The project [UK's nuclear waste dump] is now predicted to take more than 150yrs to complete with lifetime costs of £66bn in today’s money...The […]
Last year, the Dutch Province of Limburg started an alliance in which, besides the local government, research institutes, small nuclear reactor (SMR) developers, utilities, industrial customers and funders cooperated. With this "Limburg SMR alliance" Limburg tried to lead the way towards an SMR in Limburg. The preferred site for a first SMR would be Chemelot, […]
From the IPFM: During a visit to the Civaux nuclear power plant on 18 March 2024, France's Minister of the Armed Forces unveiled a plan to use the plant to produce tritium for the French nuclear weapons program. Civaux is a civilian power plant that belongs to and is operated by Electricité de France. According […]
An analysis by the Norwegian NGO Bellona of transborder trade operations with the customs code 840130 (irradiated fuel assemblies or fuel elements) show a more than twofold increase of import to EU countries of fresh nuclear fuel in cash terms – from 280 million Euros in 2022 to 686 million Euros in 2023. In physical […]
The French government has said it is "seriously" studying the option of building a plant to convert and enrich reprocessed uranium to cut its reliance on Russia following the invasion of Ukraine. The only plant in the world that currently converts reprocessed uranium for use in nuclear power plants is in Russia. "The option of […]