At a facility authorized to use low-enriched uranium to fabricate commercial nuclear fuel assemblies, excessive deposits of uranium-bearing material were found in the main scrubber and associated ventilation ductwork. The function of the scrubber is to remove gases and particulates from various process exhaust streams. During the most recent planned annual wet scrubber system cleanout, personnel noticed an abnormal amount of material buildup in the inlet transition region and associated ductwork (i.e. elbow). Over the course of the 2-day maintenance evolution approximately 197 kilograms of material were removed from these two sections. These sections are not a favorable geometry from a criticality perspective. Since the facility personnel were under the assumption that this material had a low uranium concentration, operators attempted to break up and wash away the material to facilitate its removal. The facility personnel did not sample the material to confirm the uranium concentration before conducting these activities. After the material was removed, grab samples of the material were taken and analyzed for uranium concentration. The grab sample results indicated that the uranium concentrations ranged from 34wt% – 55wt%, which corresponded to approximately 87 kilograms of uranium. As such, the criticality safety evaluation mass limit of 29 kilograms was exceeded by a factor of 3.
After the cleanout activities were completed, the scrubber was restarted. The scrubber was in operation for a period of 6 weeks when the facility personnel shutdown the scrubber to perform another cleanout of the inlet transition region and elbow. The facility personnel removed 24 kilograms of material which corresponded to approximately 5 kilograms of uranium. The scrubber was restarted again following the cleanout. Approximately 1 week later, while discussing the extent of condition, the licensee decided to shut down the scrubber again and thoroughly inspect the entire scrubber to ensure that it was free of uranium accumulation. An additional 184 kilograms of material was removed from the scrubber body, and about 71 kilograms of material was removed from the packing material.
In this incident, the mass limit was exceeded by a factor of 3; moderation was available from the scrubber spray nozzles and the clean out process; and the scrubber packing, elbow, and transition region sections are all unfavorable geometries. As a result, the safety margin available to preclude an inadvertent criticality was significantly degraded. The scrubber was shut down and the licensee commenced extent of condition and root cause evaluations. The licensee implemented several short-term and long-term corrective actions to include, revising their criticality safety analysis and integrated safety analysis, improving maintenance procedures to ensure ventilation and scrubber inspections are effective, and implementing design modifications to minimize the accumulation of material. Adequate corrective actions must be implemented and approved by regulatory authorities before processing can be restarted. NRC EN52090.
Big batteries and EVs to the rescue again as faults with new nuclear plant cause chaos on Nordic grids The Finnish nuclear power plant Olkiluoto was finally connected to the grid last year, at an estimated cost of €11 billion compared to the original budget of €3 billion. That cost blowout forced its developer, the […]
A vast subsea nuclear graveyard planned to hold Britain’s burgeoning piles of radioactive waste is set to become the biggest, longest-lasting and most expensive infrastructure project ever undertaken in the UK. The project [UK's nuclear waste dump] is now predicted to take more than 150yrs to complete with lifetime costs of £66bn in today’s money...The […]
Last year, the Dutch Province of Limburg started an alliance in which, besides the local government, research institutes, small nuclear reactor (SMR) developers, utilities, industrial customers and funders cooperated. With this "Limburg SMR alliance" Limburg tried to lead the way towards an SMR in Limburg. The preferred site for a first SMR would be Chemelot, […]
From the IPFM: During a visit to the Civaux nuclear power plant on 18 March 2024, France's Minister of the Armed Forces unveiled a plan to use the plant to produce tritium for the French nuclear weapons program. Civaux is a civilian power plant that belongs to and is operated by Electricité de France. According […]
An analysis by the Norwegian NGO Bellona of transborder trade operations with the customs code 840130 (irradiated fuel assemblies or fuel elements) show a more than twofold increase of import to EU countries of fresh nuclear fuel in cash terms – from 280 million Euros in 2022 to 686 million Euros in 2023. In physical […]