the Laka catalogue

no title author date
2.03.4.10/15Geologische Berging Van Radioactief Afval in België: Mogelijke Gevolgen voor NederlandOlsthoorn T.N. September 2011
2.03.0.00/40Fukushima: van ‘renaissance’ naar ‘meltdown’? - Framing van kernenergie in de Vlaamse pers (2002-2011)D.Geenen August 2011
2.05.0.00/57The hidden costs of nuclear power: UK’s route to its 2050 low carbon targetK.Ente June 2011
2.01.0.00/81Germany's energy turnaround - A collective effort for the futureEthics Com. Safe Energy Supply May 2011
2.01.0.00/82Nuclear phaseout by 2015 is possible: New Greenpeace calculation for a secure energy supply, free of nuclear powerGreenpeace, A.Boehling May 2011
2.34.8.10/109Chernobyl; chronology of a disasterLaka, D.Bannink, H.vd Keur March 2011
2.03.0.00/32Energie: het kernprobleem; OIKOS: Themanummer NR. 57OIKOS, D.Holemans 2011
2.34.8.10/106De generator generatie: Leven na TsjernobylF.Hummels 2011
2.34.8.15/03Chernobyl 25 years on: New safe confinement and spent fuel storage facilityEBRD 2011
2.02.2.10/11Changeons d'ère: sortons du nucléaireRéseau Sortir du nucléaire December 2010
2.01.9.31/05Notfallschutz Information für die Bevölkerung in der Umgebung des Kernkraftwerkes Emsland.Landskreis Emsland, Landkreis Grafschaft Bentheim November 2010
2.03.4.10/12Definitieve berging van hoogradioactief en/of langlevend kernafval in een kleiformatie in de Belgisch-Nederlandse grensstreekGreenpeace België, W.Weyns October 2010
2.01.8.30/28Gorleben als Entsorgungs und Endlagerstandort. Die Niedersächsische Auswahl- und Entscheidungsprozess 1976/1977 A.Tiggemann May 2010
2.12.4.10/26Erdbeben. Keine gefahr fur tiefenlager. (Themenheft Nr.4)NAGRA, A.Rieser March 2010
2.01.8.39/18Gorleben XXL. Erinnerungen für die ZukunftIngrid & Werner Lowin 2010
2.05.0.00/56The sale of the government’s interest in British EnergyNAO 2010
2.34.4.10/07Russian plutonium program: Nuclear waste, accidents, and senseless huge costsEcodefense!, Vladimir Slivyak, NIRS 2010
2.34.8.10/115Chernobyl - Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the EnvironmentA.Yablokov, V.Nesterenko, A.Nesterenko December 2009
2.05.0.00/55New nuclear – The economics say no: UK Green Lights New Nuclear – Or does it?Citigroup November 2009
2.02.0.00/69An assessment of the costs of the French nuclear PWR program 1970-2000 interim Report IR-09-036: 6 OctoberA.Grubler, IIASA October 2009
2.01.2.10/31Hausaufgaben gegen atomkraftausgestrahlt September 2009
2.34.8.31/06Chernobyl's Subclinical Legacy: Prenatal Exposure to Radioactive Fallout and School Outcomes in SwedenAlmond, Edlund, Palme September 2009
2.09.9.90/05OL3. Olkiluoto 3 Basic facts. Operating principle, Operation, safetyTVO July 2009
2.01.0.00/79Wählen Sie! Radioaktiv oder Aktiv!Energie-spezial im anti-atom-wahljahr ‘09Robin Wood June 2009
2.02.6.50/02Nuclear France Abroad. History, Status and Prospects of French Nuclear Activities in Foreign CountriesMycle Schneider May 2009
2.02.0.00/68Areva and EDF: business prospects and risks in nuclear energyS.Thomas March 2009
2.34.8.11/34Reduced Abundance of insects and spiders linked to radiation at Chernobyl 20 years after the accidentMoeller, Mousseau March 2009
2.34.8.11/35Non cancer illnesses and conditions in areas of Belarus contaminated by radioactivity from the Chernobyl accidentYuri Bandazhevski March 2009
2.02.0.00/67France’s nuclear failures. The great illusion of nuclear energyGreenpeace 2009
2.02.2.10/10Assemblé Générale 2009Réseau Sortir du nucléaire 2009