nr | titel | auteur | datum |
3.01.0.00/32 | The untold story: Economic Benefits of Nuclear Technologies | Organisations United |
1996 |
3.01.5.23/05 | Risky relapse into Reprocessing. Environmental and Non-Proliferation Consequences of DOE's Spent Fuel Management Program | Noah Sachs, IEER |
1996 |
3.27.0.00/12 | Brazilian energy balance 1996 | Min. of mines & energy |
1996 |
3.27.0.00/14 | Histórias secretas do Brasil nuclear | Tania Malheiros |
1996 |
3.28.0.00/03 | Estructura Energética | P.Bertinat, WISE Rosario |
1996 |
3.01.0.00/30 | Deadly Radiation Hazards USA database | Visual Information Project |
december 1995 |
3.01.0.20/15 | US Nuclear Power Plants -Showing their Age. Case Study: Steam Generator Corrosion | |
december 1995 |
3.01.0.20/16 | US Nuclear Power Plants -Showing their Age. Case Study: Reactor Pressure Vessel Embrittlement | Robert Pollard, Union of Concerned Scientists |
december 1995 |
3.01.0.20/14 | US Nuclear Power Plants -Showing their Age. Case Study: Core Shroud Cracking | Robert Pollard, Union of Concerned Scientists |
september 1995 |
3.02.4.10/09 | Social and Ethical Issues Surrounding the Disposal of Nuclear Fuel Waste -A Canadian Perspective | AECL, Allan, Greber |
september 1995 |
3.02.0.00/17 | Canadian Uranium and the French Nuclear Weapons Program | WISE Paris, Mycle Schneider |
augustus 1995 |
3.01.5.30/03 | Alternative Futures for DOE National Laboratories | Energy Advisory Board |
februari 1995 |
3.01.0.00/26 | A Summary History; Department of Energy 1977 - 1994 | US DOE |
november 1994 |
3.01.5.30/04 | Alternative Futures for DOE National Laboratories, Vol II | Department Of Energy |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/08 | Vol II, Part 1: Rocky Flats, Working Group Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/09 | Vol II, Part 2: Hanford, Worlking Group Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/10 | Vol II, Part 3: Los Alamos, Working Group Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/11 | Vol II, Part 4: Savannah River, Working Group Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/12 | Vol II, Part 5: Argonne - West, Working Group Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/13 | Vol II, Part 6: Lawrence Livermore Working Gr. Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/14 | Vol II, Part 7: Mound, Working Group Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/15 | Vol II, Part 8: Argonnne - East, Working Group Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/16 | Vol II, Part 9: Oak Ridge, Working Group Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/17 | Vol II, Part 10: Sandia, Working Group Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/18 | Vol II, Part 11: Lawrence Berkeley Working Gr. Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/19 | Vol II, Part 12: Pantex, Working Group Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/20 | Vol II, Part 13: Sites with small Pu Holdings WG Asses. | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/21 | Vol II, Appendix A: Process and Protocol | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/22 | Vol II, Appendix B, Part 1: Rocky Flats, Site Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |
3.01.5.30/23 | Vol II, Appendix B, Part 2: Hanford, Site Assessment | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
september 1994 |