Publication Laka-library:
Energy from Uranium
Author | J.W.Storm van Leeuwen |
6-01-2-15-44.pdf | |
Date | July 2006 |
Classification | 6.01.2.15/44 (NP & GREENHOUSE EFFECT - CO2 REDUCTION AND CLIMATE CHANGE) |
Front |
From the publication:
Energy from Uranium Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen, July 2006 In the perspective of rising prices of fossil fuels and climatological concerns, nuclear power gained renewed interest as a solution to the energy problems. This paper discusses some unique aspects of nuclear power, which may be important in the considerations of the options for the future energy supply mix This paper is based on the study Storm & Smith 2005 [6], comprising a full life cycle assessment (LCA) and analysis of the energy and mass flows of a light-water reactor (LWR) in the once-through mode. Content 1 Burners and breeders 2 Energy costs energy 3 Emission of carbon dioxide and other Green House Gases (GHGs) Carbon dioxide Emission of other greenhouse gases 4 Time scale 5 Lifetime costs Energy debt Internalising external costs, energy pay-back time 6 Uranium resources World known recoverable uranium resources Prospects of future finds 7 Extraction of uranium from ore Dilution factor Extraction yield The energy cliff The uranium peak 8 Conclusions Appendix: Breeders References Quantities and units FPY = Full-Power Year One full-power year FPY, corresponds with one year continuous operation at 100% power output. This unit avoids discussion about load factors and lifetime of the power plants. In the energy analysis the lifetime energy production and lifetime energy inputs of the system are analysed. 1 Mg = 1 megagram = 106 gram = 1 metric tonne. 1 Gg = 1 gigagram = 109 gram = 1000 metric tonnes 1 Tg = 1 teragram = 1012 gram = 1 million metric tonnes 1 TJ = 1 terajoule = 1012 joule, corresponds with 2.78x105 kWh Note In this document the references are coded by Q-numbers (e.g. Q133). Each reference has a unique number in this coding system, which is consi